Understanding that Different Agents Can Produce Different Estimates

    For sellers, one of the most important issues in real estate in setting the right listing prices for their homes. On the one hand, setting listing prices too high means reducing the number of people interested in the listed homes, but on the other hand, setting listing prices too low risks the failure to receive compensation for a portion of the listed homes’ value. Since most home sellers have insufficient understanding of the real estate market to estimate the right listing prices, it is in their best interests to listen to real estate advice coming from the experts. However, it is also important for home sellers to understand that real estate agents produce estimates and nothing but estimates, meaning that said individuals can end up disagreeing about the right listing prices.
    The Issue of Experience
     First, real estate agents can end up disagreeing because estimating the value of a home is neither simple nor straightforward. In short, selling a home on the real estate market is the sole method that can be considered a reliable estimator of its value, but it cannot be used because it is too impractical. In contrast, other methods such as the calculation of intrinsic value and comparison with similar assets reduce complex situations into useful but nonetheless over-simplified models, meaning that there is room for error from both inaccurate assumptions and insufficient information.
    Over time, real estate agents can learn to complement the usage of valuation methods with their experiences in the real estate market, resulting in better estimates that those produced using rote. However, since no career is ever the same, such individuals can still produce different estimates of the same home because the differences in their events experienced have taught them different lessons.
    The Issue of Information
    Second, real estate agents can end up disagreeing because not all such individuals have access to the same information. For example, suppose that two real estate agents in a mining town are expecting an economic slowdown. However, one of them has learned about the planned expansion of a mining operation for precious minerals in the local region, while the other has not. Since precious minerals are counter-cyclical assets, the real estate agent who is informed will recommend a higher listing price than the counterpart because the planned expansion should soften the blow of the economic slowdown on demand in the local real estate market.
    In short, even assuming that real estate agents possess the same understanding of real estate, discrepancies in the information available to them can cause them to differ in opinion. Furthermore, matters can become even more complicated if some real estate agents choose to prioritize certain pieces of information while refusing to heed others.
    Conclusion
     To sum up, homeowners planning to sell in Grand Junction should seek out real estate advice from the experts, but also remain cautious about using them. In general, real estate agents with better connections and more experience produce more reliable estimates, though homeowners should still seek out real estate advice from multiple experts just to be sure.

    Trackback from your site.

    Leave a Reply